Did Barack Obama really say the following? The views below represent the reasons I plan to remain a Republican:
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama defended his belief in same-sex civil unions March 2 by referencing Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount and then implicitly criticizing those who view Romans as a binding teaching on homosexuality.
Obama made the comments during a question-and-answer session with voters in Nelsonville, Ohio. A local pastor asked Obama how he plans to win the votes of evangelical voters when they disagree with him on moral issues.
“I believe in civil unions that allow a same-sex couple to visit each other in a hospital or transfer property to each other,” he said, referring to unions that grant all the legal benefits of marriage, minus the name. “I don’t think it should be called marriage, but I think that it is a legal right that they should have that is recognized by the state. If people find that controversial, then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount, which I think is, in my mind, for my faith, more central than an obscure passage in Romans. That’s my view. But we can have a respectful disagreement on that.”
The Sermon on the Mount is found in Matthew 5-7, the passage in Romans is found in chapter 1, verses 26-32.
But Obama’s quote may open him up to further criticism from evangelicals, because it’s a common evangelical belief that all of Scripture is inspired by God and equally authoritative — that is, the words of Jesus in Matthew are just as inspired as the words of Paul in Romans. Although it is often argued by homosexual activists that Jesus said nothing about same-sex relationships, He in fact defined marriage as between one man and one woman in such passages as Mark 10:6-9.
And below are his views on abortion:
“[W]e should prevent it as much as possible by making sure that young people are engaging in responsible behavior and that we are encouraging the kinds of good decisions that prevent unwanted pregnancies and that we are encouraging adoption as an alternative,” he said. “But I think that at the bottom line is that in the end I think women, in consultation with their pastors, and their doctors and their family, are in a better position to make these decisions than some bureaucrat in Washington.
“That’s my view. Again, I respect people who may disagree, but I certainly don’t think it makes me less Christian.”
Obama’s comments came three days after he released a 770-word letter to the homosexual community, pledging to partner with them in passing favorable laws if he is elected.
“As your President, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws,” he wrote. “I personally believe that civil unions represent the best way to secure that equal treatment. But I also believe that the federal government should not stand in the way of states that want to decide on their own how best to pursue equality for gay and lesbian couples — whether that means a domestic partnership, a civil union, or a civil marriage.
“… I believe that we can achieve the goal of full equality for the millions of LGBT people in this country,” he said further, referring to the acronym for lesbian, gays, bisexual and transgendered. “To do that, we need leadership that can appeal to the best parts of the human spirit. Join with me, and I will provide that leadership. Together, we will achieve real equality for all Americans, gay and straight alike.”
Um…Look folks, I voted for Huckabee, the born again Christian.
Hat tip to HickTowner, Monica for article

American Idol
Tiger Woods
Now you know he can’t accept Oprah’s money and support and not have gay marriage on the agenda. Most of the folk in Oprah’s ‘camp’ are homosexual (Nate Berkus, Suze Orman, Reggie (makeup guy), Andre (hair stylist), etc., and other Hollywood celebs would not back him otherwise.
The views below represent the reasons I plan to remain a Republican
——————————
I find your comments regarding homosexuality interesting. Remember Republican vice president Dick the coward “Mr Draft Deferment” Cheney? His daughter is a homosexual and openly lives with her husband/partner!
Consider this:
White House Officially Recognizes Homosexual Unions and Parenting?
HUNTINGTON, Conn., May 30, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – On May 23, 2007, the White House released an official White House photo of Vice President Dick Cheney and his wife, Lynne Cheney, welcoming their sixth grandchild, Samuel David Cheney, into the Cheney fold. The child is the offspring of Mary Cheney and an unreported male sperm donor.
However the official White House photo caption indicates the child’s “parents” are Mary Cheney and her homosexual partner, Heather Poe.
Stephen Bennett, a pro-family advocate who left the homosexual lifestyle and now has a ministry to convince others of its dangers, expressed his concern about the White House’s decision to caption the photo this way. “What is extremely troubling is the official White House caption that appears underneath the photo on the official White House website,” said Bennett.
Rather than merely stating that the child is the “child of their daughter Mary Cheney,” the White House photo caption states, “… His parents are the Cheney’s daughter Mary, and her partner, Heather Poe.”
“Since when have two homosexual women been able to naturally procreate?,” commented Bennett. “Fact is Mary Cheney, the Vice President’s daughter – in one way or another – received a male’s sperm. She is the biological mother, parent number one, and some man, somewhere out there, is Samuel David’s real biological father, parent number two.”
He added, “Heather Poe is Mary Cheney’s live-in lesbian lover. She may act like a parent, she may treat the baby as a parent, she may love this baby with all of her heart, but in this reality we all live in, Heather Poe is NOT the baby’s real parent. She has NO biological connection to the child whatsoever. Some man, the baby’s real Daddy, is the child’s other REAL parent.”
Bennnet called the White House to account for what he called its “Double Speak,” pointing out that while Bush has publicly stated that he is against recognizing homosexual unions, by recognizing Heather Poe as one of Samuel Cheney’s “parents” he is effectively doing exactly that.
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/may/07053008.html
Talk is cheap. As far as republicans are concerned, it never happened. The earth is flat.