Ex-Minnesota Viking, Darrion Scott Charged with Child Abuse
May 09, 2008by Deputy Diva
Excuse me, can I get a few of the HickTown menfolk together to go and beat this clown’s behind?
What on earth would possess this big
6 foot 3,” 289 lb. goon to hold a dry cleaning bag over his son’s head and then claim he was “just playing”?
Apparently, this is not the first instance in which his son was allegedly abused by him either.
The child’s mother also reported that Scott brought the boy to her home at the end of March or early April and asked to bathe him to get the boy ready for bed. The woman said Scott had never before bathed the boy in her home. Scott dressed the boy in long pajamas, and the next morning the woman noted that the boy had marks on his arm and ear that appeared to be burns, the complaint said.
Click HERE for the full story.
I’m really outraged by this! That boy didn’t ask to come into this world and just because his sperm donor’s NFL career has gone down the toilet, does not give him the right to take it out on that child.
This freak also apparently has a history of being in trouble with the law. He was arrested, this past December for Marijuana possession. SOURCE
May 9th, 2008 at 11:36 am
Poor little guy.
The women need to take some of the responsibility of the type of men they reproduce with. If we can find out about his history, I’m sure they can to.
I would suspect paying “child support” is what causes the abandonment, neglect and abuse of these athletes’ toward their own children? No contract, no money.
Football is a violent and aggressive sport. Some of these men learned this behavior at 6 years old. Coaches yelling and screaming all the time..hit harder, run faster. I was so glad when my son quit!
We need more black scientist, doctors, nurses, teachers etc… than athletes. The money or athlete rarely comes back to the neighborhood anyway.
May 9th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
I agree and what really floors me is his parents basically defending him. Um, how did the child get all those marks on him? That boy’s mother should demand that he not be allowed near the boy unless the visit is a supervised one.