Sorry, ma’am. No such thing as a pregnant man!

I ignored this story initially because satan is constantly in search of attention and I certainly did not want to give him any.

Now that the story has died down, I’ll just say this. This FREAK had her breasts removed, took some male hormones and now SHE is pretending to be a pregnant man.

Sorry, lady. Men don’t have monthly periods. And the fact that you are pregnant tells me that you definitely have one. Your pal Oprah may believe you are cute but I see you for what you are—a confused, very deeply disturbed freak.

Let’s just call a spade a spade here.

Mr Beatie was born female, named Tracy Lagondino, but had gender reassignment surgery and is now legally male and married to a woman.

He decided to carry a baby for his wife, Nancy, because she had a hysterectomy years ago. He was able to get pregnant because he kept his female organs when he switched genders.

Sterilisation is not a requirement for sex reassignment, so I decided to have chest reconstruction and testosterone therapy but kept my reproductive rights, he writes. Wanting to have a biological child is neither a male nor female desire but a human desire. The couple, who have been together for ten years, run a custom screenprinting business in Bend, Oregon, where neighbours do not know that Mr Beatie was once a woman.

Our desire to work hard, buy our first home and start a family was nothing out of the ordinary. That is, until we decided that I would carry our child, he wrote.

Before becoming pregnant, Mr Beatie stopped the testosterone injections he was receiving as part of his gender reassignment. It had been roughly eight years since I had my last menstrual cycle so this wasn’t a decision that I took lightly. My body regulated itself after about four months and I didn’t have to take any exogenous oestrogen, progesterone or fertility drugs to aid my pregnancy, he wrote.

The couple bought donor vials from a cryogenic sperm bank and, facing resistance and prejudice from doctors, resorted to home insemination. Doctors have discriminated against us, turning us away due to their religious beliefs. Healthcare professionals have refused to call me by a male pronoun or recognise Nancy as my wife. Receptionists have laughed at us. Friends and family have been unsupportive; most of Nancy’s family doesn’t even know I’m transgender, he said.

source

  Can you imagine being 22 years old and a “high class” prostitute? What a sad life choice:

Below is the MySpace Page of “Kristen”, the prostitute who Governor Spitzer risked everything for: PRESS HERE

Did Barack Obama really say the following?  The views below represent the reasons I plan to remain a Republican:

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama defended his belief in same-sex civil unions March 2 by referencing Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount and then implicitly criticizing those who view Romans as a binding teaching on homosexuality.

Obama made the comments during a question-and-answer session with voters in Nelsonville, Ohio. A local pastor asked Obama how he plans to win the votes of evangelical voters when they disagree with him on moral issues.

“I believe in civil unions that allow a same-sex couple to visit each other in a hospital or transfer property to each other,” he said, referring to unions that grant all the legal benefits of marriage, minus the name. “I don’t think it should be called marriage, but I think that it is a legal right that they should have that is recognized by the state. If people find that controversial, then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount, which I think is, in my mind, for my faith, more central than an obscure passage in Romans. That’s my view. But we can have a respectful disagreement on that.”

The Sermon on the Mount is found in Matthew 5-7, the passage in Romans is found in chapter 1, verses 26-32.

But Obama’s quote may open him up to further criticism from evangelicals, because it’s a common evangelical belief that all of Scripture is inspired by God and equally authoritative — that is, the words of Jesus in Matthew are just as inspired as the words of Paul in Romans. Although it is often argued by homosexual activists that Jesus said nothing about same-sex relationships, He in fact defined marriage as between one man and one woman in such passages as Mark 10:6-9.

And below are his views on abortion:

“[W]e should prevent it as much as possible by making sure that young people are engaging in responsible behavior and that we are encouraging the kinds of good decisions that prevent unwanted pregnancies and that we are encouraging adoption as an alternative,” he said. “But I think that at the bottom line is that in the end I think women, in consultation with their pastors, and their doctors and their family, are in a better position to make these decisions than some bureaucrat in Washington.

“That’s my view. Again, I respect people who may disagree, but I certainly don’t think it makes me less Christian.”

Obama’s comments came three days after he released a 770-word letter to the homosexual community, pledging to partner with them in passing favorable laws if he is elected.

“As your President, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws,” he wrote. “I personally believe that civil unions represent the best way to secure that equal treatment. But I also believe that the federal government should not stand in the way of states that want to decide on their own how best to pursue equality for gay and lesbian couples — whether that means a domestic partnership, a civil union, or a civil marriage.

“… I believe that we can achieve the goal of full equality for the millions of LGBT people in this country,” he said further, referring to the acronym for lesbian, gays, bisexual and transgendered. “To do that, we need leadership that can appeal to the best parts of the human spirit. Join with me, and I will provide that leadership. Together, we will achieve real equality for all Americans, gay and straight alike.”

source

Um…Look folks, I voted for Huckabee, the born again Christian.

Hat tip to HickTowner, Monica for article

You must see this YouTube video to believe it. Several men (plants, I’m guessing) called their local Planned Parenthood offices to say that they desired to earmark money have have black babies aborted and the operators agreed with glee.

PRESS HERE and watch the entire video

Do you want to hear something really off the wall? I’ve always known that feminist groups such as the National Organization for Women (NOW) consists of a group of miserable hags. But it’s unfortunate that those hags are trying to take away even the basic right of people to pick and choose who they will vote for.

Look at how NOW insulted Ted Kennedy for endorsing Obama:

The National Organization for Women’s New York chapter today issued a scathing response to Sen. Ted Kennedys endorsement of Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton in the Democratic presidential primary, calling it a “betrayal” of women.

Marcia Pappas, NOW-NY’s president, wrote in a news release that on a host of issues and positions, “Women have forgiven Kennedy, stuck up for him, stood by him,” but “We are repaid with his abandonment. He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton.”

SOURCE

Where is the logic in that? We now must ignore the candidate’s belief systems, etc. and vote on gender? How is it a betrayal of women for Kennedy to freely choose who he wants in office? Sick women, they are.

If you don’t believe that more and more rights of Christians are being violated, check out this case of a woman in Texas who was put off the bus for reading the bible to her children:

A passenger on a Fort Worth bus says the T. Bus Service discriminated against her religion.

Christine Lutz says she was reading her Bible to her children when the bus driver asked her to stop or get off the bus.

Lutz, a Seventh Day Adventist, and her children were on their way to church.

“She then said, ‘Well I don’t think this is the place or the time to do so.’ And I said, ‘Oh, but it’s the perfect time and the perfect place since it is our Sabbath and it is the time with the Lord and therefore I’m going to continue.’ And I continued,” she explained.

Then, a TRE supervisor came on board. Lutz also told him that she would not stop reading. She and her family were escorted off the bus.

Read the remainder to the story HERE

It’s really sad when you cannot even send your child to school for fear of a so called teacher verbally attacking your child for being a Christian:

James Corbett, who teaches Advanced Placement European history at Capistrano Valley High School, consistently “demonstrates a sense of hostility toward religion,” causing Christian students to “feel ostracized and treated as second-class citizens,” according to the lawsuit filed in federal district court in Santa Ana by Chad Farnan, 16, and his parents, Bill and Teresa.

The lawsuit contends, among other things, that Corbett told students during class that “when you put on your Jesus glasses, you can’t see the truth”; said that religion is not “connected with morality”; compared Christians to “Muslim fundamentalists” who want women to “stay pregnant, barefoot, and in the kitchen and have babies until your body collapses”; and suggested that churchgoers are more likely to commit rape and murder.

Let’s pray that the family who sued this jerk wins.

Source  

I’ll start off by saying that I don’t respect Barbara Walters as an interviewer or journalist. I find her boring, lackluster, and her questions are oftentimes silly. And although I am no fan of Star Jones, I found her treatment of Star Jones as a human being to be offensive. For her to stab Star Jones in the back and then suggest that Star tell a false story for why she was leaving. And then to just fire her for being honest. I have never watched The View. And I never will.

Why do I mention Walters, a woman I don’t like? Because I just read about her insulting the White House for sending her a card with a scripture on it. Now what does that tell you about her respect for Christians and the true purpose of Christmas? If Christmas exists to acknowledge the birthday of Jesus Christ, then why wouldn’t a card have a scripture verse on it? And why would she be offended by it? Again, Christians are supposed to lay aside our feelings and disregard our religion for jerks and athiests, right?

Barbara Walters recently criticized a Christmas card she received from the White House this year for featuring a seven-line scripture from the Bible.

The card, signed by the President and Mrs. Bush, was among a small stack of Christmas cards showcased by Walters on last Thursday’s episode of ABC’s The View.

Usually in the past when I have received a Christmas card, it’s been Happy Holidays  and so on, said Walters.

But the veteran anchor expressed dismay that President Bush and the First Lady would send out a religious Christmas card with a direct Bible verse from the Old Testament printed inside:

You alone are the LORD. You made the heavens, even the highest heavens, and all their starry host, the earth and all that is on it, the seas and all that is in them. You give life to everything, and the multitudes of heaven worship you.

After reading the scriptural message of the card, Walters asked in a critical tone, “Does this also go to agnostics, and atheists, and Muslims?”

OH, now I get it. Barbara Walters is just too dumb to know that Christmas is not about agnostics and atheists. It’s about Jesus! Poor thing.

SOURCE

Who would have imagined a time in the U.S. where Christianity would be basically outlawed? New York recently granted permission for the Christian Defense Coalition to display a nativity scene for a whopping TWO HOURS. Why only two hours?

Yet, I guarantee you that if any other religion wanted to display a scene representing their beliefs, they would not be subjected to time constraints. Wake up, America. This is REAL!

New York gives permission to the Christian Defense Coalition to display a small nativity scene Saturday, December 15 from 11:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M.

The location of the display will be on Broadway and 44th Street right below MTV

Rev. Mahoney, who is part of the project, said:

“Sadly, we are seeing an erosion and crushing of religious freedoms across America. This is especially true during the Christmas season where there is an open hostility toward public expressions of faith. We must constantly remind our public officials that the Constitution promises freedom ‘of’ religion not freedom ‘from’ religion.

“It is essential that the faith community not be intimidated into surrendering their God give First Amendment freedoms which offers to all Americans the right to publicly worship God free from government interference or harassment. That is why it is so important for this Nativity Scene to be in Times Square.

How about that? Interesting.

Go here for more of story

I meant to write this article a few days ago, but my blog was down. I just remembered!

First of all, I have always questioned the sanity of any man who would become a sperm donor. That’s just crazy. What sane man would want his offspring out there in the world, his seed just spread to and fro in that manner?

Lesbian couples are famous for using sperm donors because as shocking as this may be to a few reading this, two men cannot create life together and neither can two women. It takes a man and a woman to create life. That’s how God made it and that is how it is going to be.

In desperation of keeping their fantasy lifestyle going strong, many homosexual couples use sperm banks and sperm donors.

Well guess what? In England a silly man is being sued by a lesbian couple who recently broke up. Why? Because he was crazy enough to donate his sperm to them and now they want child support.

The lesbian mother of two children conceived with a friend’s sperm yesterday denied it is unfair to make him pay for their upbringing.

Terri Arnold, 25, had a boy and a girl after fireman Andy Bathie agreed to take part in a home insemination.

Bathie now has to pay £450 a month toward bringing up the two children produced using his sperm.

He insisted he was only a donor and did not want take an active role in raising the youngsters.

But the mother has hit back, claiming the 37-year-old changed his mind and regularly saw his four-year-old daughter.

Source

This should be a wake up call to other men. DON’T be dumb enough to donate your sperm. Those are real babies being produced and you have a real chance of having to pay child support!