Article written by Day Gardner

Throughout the month of February, we take the time….one month out of the year to remember the tragedies and celebrate the triumphs of African Americans in history. We celebrate the fact that we are a strong race that survived the many horrors and inhumane treatment when we were an enslaved people—presumed by many to be less than human.

We came together in the 1960’s facing very difficult times when hundreds of African Americans suffered physical torture and sometimes even death…all for wanting to experience the American dream and for insisting that we be allowed that which we as American citizens are entitled to under the laws of this great country. And since the 60’s we have continued to make great strides in breaking down color barriers and the walls of inequality. We become doctors, lawyers, educators, movie stars, corporations and conglomerates. But I worry that many of us in the black community have forgotten what the struggle was all about. In our quest for higher education, bigger houses, better jobs and flashier cars…are we closing our eyes to the fact that more than a thousand of our children die each day by the horrible practice of abortion?

These children are denied their most basic human right –which is the right to life; a right which our ancestors so proudly worked for, marched for and many of them died for. More than 44 million children have been killed by abortion—15 million of them were black children. Abortion has become the number one killer of black people in this country—killing more African Americans than accidents, heart disease, stroke, crimes, HIV-AIDS and all other deaths…COMBINED!

What bothers me is we are very quick as a people to recognize racism everywhere else except the one place that truly affects all of us. Most blacks will agree that racism is still very much alive—yet say nothing when abortion facilities are placed purposefully in minority and poor communities. This is no accident! More than 37% of all abortions are performed on black women. Last year alone, more than 400,000 black babies were killed by abortion.

GO HERE to read remainder of article

It is so sad that our nation has come to this. This infanticide on all babies, regardless of race, is unthinkable and a form of barbarism.  You know, the Lord advised all humans to wait until after marriage to have sexual relations.  That ONE command would halt venereal diseases. And because it is rare for married women to abort babies, it would significantly decrease the abortion rate.  That ONE command.

We are in the Last Days, ya’ll.

WARNING: If you have a particularly weak stomach, please skip over this article. Fortunately there are plenty others on this blog that would be more appropriate for you. I aim to please in writing a variety of article types to fit the needs of the various personalities that visit Hicktown. Thanks!

In perhaps one of the most gruesome crime scenes ever discovered in the state of Maryland, the bodies of two…no, three…scratch that and make it FOUR infants—were unearthed at the home of Christy Freeman, a 37 year old mother of four. It appears that Ms. Freeman—who has a criminal record, is too lazy to use birth control or have her tubes tied, and consequently has been performing abortions on herself!

This is all “alleged” of course but things don’t look good for Ms. Freeman. The facts all point directly at her.

I’ll pause here and offer you one more opportunity to stop reading if you have a weak stomach. Otherwise, read on…

Check out where that sociopath has been storing the aborted babies:

One dead baby (newly delivered) was found below Ms. Freeman’s bathroom sink

Two dead babies were found in a trunk in Ms. Freeman’s bedroom

One dead baby was found in a motor home parked on her property   Source:

In case you are wondering, this is not Ms. Freeman’s first brush with the law. I went to the public records in Maryland and found the following:

In April, 1997 Ms. Freeman was found guilty and fined for having a dog at large

In June, 1999 Ms. Freeman was found guilty and fined for failing to obtain a dog license

In August, 1999 Ms. Freeman again was fined for allowing her dogs to run loose

I’ve heard that there is a correlation between the way people treat animals and the way they treat children. We can see the correlation here in this case.

In February, 2006 Ms. Freeman lost a civil lawsuit to Atlantic General Hospital and ordered to pay $960.00

On July 27, 2007 Ms. Freeman was arrested (no bail granted) on the following charges:

Charge 1 - Murder - First degree

Charge 2 - Murder - Second degree

Charge 3 - Manslaughter

I’m happy that she was denied bail. She is a flight risk. Any woman bold enough to murder babies and keep them in the house where she lives with her living children and boyfriend is a dangerous woman.

***To comment on this article, simply hit one of the “comments” buttons located in the upper and lower right hand corners and scroll to the bottom***

Louisiana is the first state to ban partial-birth abortions following a ruling from the Supreme Court saying a national ban on the gruesome abortion procedure is constitutional. The high court ruled such bans don’t need a health exception because the three-day-long abortion procedure doesn’t protect women’s health.

This is great news! Considering the trauma that Louisiana has been through recently, thanks goodness they are emerging from the wreckage with a positive outlook while doing positive things. Why are the other states so slow? Why does Louisiana have to lead the way on something so obvious? It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that there is something terribly wrong with stabbing a full term, normal baby in the head and sucking out his brains. Louisiana has gotten it right here!

Under the measures, anyone who does a partial-birth abortion could be fined between $1,000 and $10,000 and go to prison for anywhere from one to 10 years.

Yes, the butchers—calling themselves doctors who perform such infanticide should receive the same penalty as someone who has been arrested for pre-meditated murder because obviously that is what this so-called abortion method truly is.

The bill would prohibit more than 300 such abortions that are done in the state on an annual basis.

It astounds the mind that there is such a high number of such cruel “abortions” in one state alone. Two thumbs up to Louisiana for leading the nation on this!

Source

Filed under: Breaking News, Health Watch, Infanticide

Okay, so here is the million dollar question. What type of a brain would even conceptualize the very idea of partial birth abortion? Where does that mess even come from? Who’s creation?  And quite frankly, what’s next?  I envision some Frankenstein-ish type doctor coming up with a new “procedure” that says that the baby can be “aborted” after leaving the womb—as long as you kill it before it starts to cry of course. After all, it’s not truly alive until it makes a sound, right?  Yes, I know it sounds crazy, but liberals tend to suffer that malady.  I am 100% positive that the FemiGals over at the National Organization for Women would defend such a proposal, as would many other leftist types who suffer the Anarchy Syndrome.Partial birth abortion—which is actually a fancy name for infanticide, is the brain child of Dr. Martin Haskell and the late Dr. James McMahon.  I wonder where Dr. McMahon’s soul is right now and when he arrived at the Judgment Seat—whether or not he boldly defended his gruesome practice to the Lord the way he did to us mere mortals?

Read Dr. McMahon’s views for yourself:

After 20 weeks where it frankly is a child to me, I really agonize over it because the potential is so imminently there. I think, ‘Gee, it’s too bad that this child couldn’t be adopted.’ On the other hand, I have another position, which I think is superior in the hierarchy of questions, and that is: ‘Who owns the child?’ It’s got to be the mother. Link Mothers own children? That’s a scary thought, isn’t it?  And do fathers come into play at all—or are they simply sperm donors? Do fathers not matter?  Following the ridiculous and frightening thought that mothers “own” children—as though children are property, one could also argue that since mothers own children, it’s not illegal for mothers to offer their “property” up to pedophiles as prostitutes to support their drug habits. Let’s face it. That sort of thing happens every day. And if mothers own children, then it would not be illegal for a mother to take her infant and throw her into a microwave oven (happened recently).  Likewise, wouldn’t her “ownership” allow her to blow her child’s brains out or drown him/her?

The truth of the matter is that mothers do not “own” children. Mothers are blessed with the right to rear their own children and they have guardianship over their children until their children are old enough to fend for themselves.  One can certainly own an animal (sorry, PETA) or a car but never can one “own” a human being. That smacks of slavery…chattel. Let’s not even go there!

 My skin crawls at the thought that although Dr. McMahon clearly admitted that he knew he was taking the life of a real and viable child, he did so anyway because of the mother’s desire. After all, she “owns” this thing called a child. Wow! 

His pal, Dr. Haskell shares the same gruesome thoughts:

Dr. Martin Haskell, of Cincinnati, told U.S. District Judge John Shabaz that the intact dilation and extraction procedure (D&X) he pioneered and introduced at a National Abortion Federation conference in 1992 is the safest way to perform abortions on women who are 20 to 24 weeks pregnant.  Haskell said he has done about 2,000 D&X abortions in which he maneuvers the nonviable fetus so he can pull all but its head, feet first, from the uterus. He said he then cuts the umbilical cord and collapses the head so it can fit through the cervical opening. Link

Now if you believe the hype about women aborting late term babies due to emergency health issues, check out what the good doctor himself has to say about that myth:

I’ll be quite frank: most of my abortions are elective in that 20-24 week range. . . . In my particular case, probably 20% [of this procedure] are for genetic reasons. And the other 80% are purely elective. Link

You know what? I’m not even going to sit here and play with this nonsense because I find nothing cute about a politically correct climate which tries to find just the right word to cover up bile.  Bile is bile, folks.  As Shakespeare would say, a rose by any other name is still a rose.  And murder is still murder and abortion is still infanticide.  Let’s just pull the cover off this nonsense and expose it for what it is.

I underlined two words in Dr. Haskell’s quote:  genetic and elective

Basically he was saying that 20% of the abortions he performs are because some woman decided that the Down Syndrome—or other type of imperfect, child she was carrying did not deserve life.  Note that none of the abortions he performs are due to a risk to the woman’s life.

By no means am I a fan of George Bush, but I must give credit where credit is due. During his two terms in office he made one great achievement. He appointed the right men to the Supreme Court. Those men are sensible and have just enough conservative morals to see through the abortion lies. Thank God that they are young enough to be around for awhile.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority handed anti-abortion forces a major victory Wednesday in a decision that bans a controversial abortion procedure and set the stage for further restrictions. For the first time since the court established a woman’s right to an abortion in 1973, the justices upheld a nationwide ban on a specific abortion method, labeled partial-birth abortion by its opponents. The 5-4 decision written by Justice Anthony Kennedy said the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act that Congress passed and President Bush signed into law in 2003 does not violate a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion. The law is constitutional despite not containing an exception that would allow the procedure if needed to preserve a woman’s health, Kennedy said. “The law need not give abortion doctors unfettered choice in the course of their medical practice,” he wrote in the majority opinion. Doctors who violate the law face up to two years in federal prison.  Kennedy’s opinion, joined by Bush’s two appointees, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, was a long-awaited resounding win that abortion opponents expected from the more conservative bench. The administration defended the law as drawing a bright line between abortion and infanticide. Reacting to the ruling, Bush said that it affirms the progress his administration has made to defend the “sanctity of life.”Link

And so the fight continues…

File under: Health Watch & Infanticide