RARELY do I cover a story that leaves me physically ill. And my regular readers know that I’ve covered some sick, sick stories. Everything from pastors who rape church members to pedophiles.

But in the almost 2 years that I have been blogging, this is the first time I’ve wanted to run to the nearest bathroom and get sick.

Facts:

1. The alleged criminal is none other than an employee of Duke University. He is presently on unpaid leave, pending investigation. However, he was employed as the Director of the Center for Health Policy.

2. Frank Lombard is white male homosexual who adopted two black male children. This monster allegedly bragged that he purposely adopted black boys because they were easier to adopt than were white children.

2. Allegedly, via web cam, this perverted monster who goes by the handle, “Cooper2″ online, has been seen performing oral sex, anal sex and other unthinkable things on his children. By the way, he also referred to himself online as “Perv dad for fun”.

3. He recently was busted for trying to offer his 5 year old child up to a stranger for rape. He offered to have the stranger “do anything” he wanted to the boy, and he’d meet the stranger in a hotel room.

No respect or care that the stranger could give the adopted child HIV. No respect for the horrifying pain that the child would be in.

I am 100% positive that this sicko adopted those black boys for perverted purposes. He adopted them to rape and sodomize and destroy them. And because they are black, it was easier for him because I’m sure he hates blacks anyway.

Frank McCorkle Lombard, 42, was arrested on Thursday. From his home, investigators seized two web cams, five computers, and a sex toy, among other items. And, according to the affidavit, Lombard’s partner did not participate in the molestation of the child. The abuse was carried out when the partner was out on business. Both children have been placed in protective custody.

SOURCE and SOURCE

By:  Lynn Green

MoKelly sent me an interesting article that sums up attention whoring at its best—or worst.

First of all, fraternities are for men and sororities are for women. If a person does not view themselves as male or female, that person needs to start his or her own fraternal organization. I truly do have a problem with trouble makers who will do just anything to get attention.

I’ve been hard on the Zetas in the past due to their allowing Sheryl Underwood to become their leader. It’s a disgrace in my view. But I have to side with the Zetas on a new issue—a lesbian trying to force them to call her a “he”, and other nonsense. I do blame the Zetas for voting this individual into their private organization, though.

From the time that Devin Alston-Smith became involved in George Washington University’s Zeta Phi Beta sorority, he made it clear that he was not your typical sorority sister. In spring 2008, Alston-Smith began what Zetas refer to as the “intake process.” He knew his sisters would have a lot to take in: He asked them to call him Devin instead of his legal name, Chanise. He told them he preferred male pronouns—”he” and “his” instead of “she” and “her.” At sorority events, he wore a button-down shirt and tie and a fedora over his long dreadlocked hair.

Let us pause there. “He?” If “he” has a monthly period, a vagina, and a pair of breasts, “he” is a she. Hello?

Furthermore, why did not this individual attempt to join a fraternity if SHE believes she is a HE? I refuse to call anything that’s using a tampon a he. Simple as that. If you plan to be called a “he” by me, you had better produce a set of testicles and a penis (that you were born with!)

Alston-Smith had never intended to become anybody’s sister. “I was anti-sorority for a long time,” says Alston-Smith. “Then I joined Zeta.”

The bible says that a double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

Whatever is going on in the mind and heart and soul of this woman who has a monthly period and trying to convince folks that she is a he, is waaaaaaaay too deep for the Zetas to have to deal with.

Check this out:

When Alston-Smith stopped attending sorority events, he withdrew from other parts of his life as well. He began to skip classes. Instead, he would hole up, crying, in his dorm room. As the fall semester neared its end, he decided he couldn’t come back—he would take a leave of absence and spend the spring semester at home, in Connecticut. Before Alston-Smith left, he gathered all his Zeta paraphernalia and destroyed it. He ripped apart his letter jacket and scratched out the Zeta Phi Beta emblem on the sorority plaque. He smashed his paddle and tore up the keepsake boxes gifted to him by former sisters. He gathered the blue-and-white mess and placed it in a trash bag. On top, he wrote a note: “You took the liberty of ruining things for me. Now I am returning them to you. All my best, Devin.” He left the bag on White’s doorstep.

Jardine called the gesture a “vicious act of violence.” Zeta Phi Beta has filed a complaint against Alston-Smith with the university.

“It wasn’t a violent or a vicious act. It was a final cry of submission,” says Alston-Smith. “At that point, I had given up.”

Crying?  Are there any MEN out there who would be willing to give that gal a lesson on manhood?  Men are simply not that emotional over things!

If anyone wants to read this nonsense in its entirety, GO HERE

By: Lynn Green

Have women gone out of style at George Mason University?  Apparently they have, as a drag queen was chosen as the homecoming queen. Wow, what a mockery of the process.

George Mason University senior Ryan Allen dresses in drag and doesn’t mind being called a queen — homecoming queen, to be exact.

Allen beat out two women for the homecoming queen title at the 30,000-student George Mason University in suburban Washington, D.C

Allen, who is gay and performs in drag at nightclubs in the region, said he entered the homecoming contest as a joke, competing as Reann Ballslee, his drag queen persona.

But he considers the victory one of his happiest moments and proof that the suburban Washington, D.C., school famous for its run to the Final Four a few years back celebrates its diverse student body.

“I was very touched by how Mason was so supportive through the whole process of allowing a boy in a dress to run for homecoming queen,” Allen said in a phone interview. “It says a lot about the campus that not only do we have diversity but we celebrate it.”

SOURCE

(Photo by Teddy Meyer – Broadside)

By:  Lynn Green

This is a follow up to a story I reported on last year.  Link

A group of fire fighters out in California were forced to attend a gay pride parade where they—in spite of being heterosexual, were forced to endure all types of offensive and unwanted comments and lewd behaviors of a group of clowns out there acting a fool.

Good news. They won their lawsuit:

A jury determined Tuesday that four San Diego firefighters were sexually harassed for being ordered to participate in a gay pride parade and awarded them combined damages of $34,300.

The firefighters — Alex Kane, Chad Allison, Capt. John Ghiotto and Capt. Jason Hewitt — claimed they were subjected to sexually charged conduct and lewd comments while riding a fire engine in the July 2007 parade, which drew about 150,000 spectators.

The firefighters’ attorney, Charles LiMandri, said during his closing argument that his clients were targets of vulgar gestures and catcalls while being forced to watch barely clothed men and women simulate sex acts and touch themselves and one another.

“The Fire Department knew what goes on there,” LiMandri told the jury.

This was the second trial on the firefighters’ claims. In October, jurors were unable to reach a verdict.

SOURCE

By:  Lynn Green

  I like to see students in uniforms. One great thing about wearing uniforms to school is that at a minimum, uniforms remove the self-expression that sometimes gets out of control.

With school uniforms, there is no need to worry about baggy pants with drawers showing. No need to worry about mini-skirts and cleavage. No need to worry about Daisy Dukes being worn to school, or halter tops for that matter.

I’d even like to see uniform shoes worn. That would eliminate the Michael Jordan tennis and other expensive shoes that children get robbed over.

I remember reading the story of a 15 year old student named Larry King. He was adopted. Had lived a rough life. My guess is that he was not a very happy person. He had taken to wearing girls’ clothes and makeup to school, making a spectacle of himself. School is not there to serve the purpose of clownish behavior. School is supposed to be a place where people go to learn.

In any event, he appeared to thrive off of the attention he gained by dressing inappropriately at school. Some of his teachers even encouraged his dress and behavior.

In other classes, teachers were baffled that Larry was allowed to draw so much attention to himself. “All the teachers were complaining, because it was disruptive,” says one of them. “Dress code is a huge issue at our school. We fight [over] it every day.” Some teachers thought Larry was clearly in violation of the code, which prevents students from wearing articles of clothing considered distracting. When Larry wore lipstick and eyeliner to school for the first time, a teacher told him to wash it off, and he did. But the next day, he was back wearing even more. Larry told the teacher he could wear makeup if he wanted to. He said that Ms. Epstein [assistant principal] told him that was his right.

In my personal opinion, his case was a disaster waiting to happen. People are free to be homosexuals. But your rights end where mine begin and he had no right to subject others to his behavior:

At 15, Lawrence King was small—5 feet 1 inch—but very hard to miss. In January, he started to show up for class at Oxnard, Calif.’s E. O. Green Junior High School decked out in women’s accessories. On some days, he would slick up his curly hair in a Prince-like bouffant. Sometimes he’d paint his fingernails hot pink and dab glitter or white foundation on his cheeks. “He wore makeup better than I did,” says Marissa Moreno, 13, one of his classmates. He bought a pair of stilettos at Target, and he couldn’t have been prouder if he had on a varsity football jersey. He thought nothing of chasing the boys around the school in them, teetering as he ran. 

Long story short, things got so bad that he eventually approached another boy who clearly was a heterosexual, and asked the boy to be his Valentine. The boy brought a gun to school and blew him away. Very, very sad. This young man, Larry King, was allowed and even encouraged to come to school dressed like a clownish weirdo. He brought negative attention to himself.

I cannot help but wonder why a school would allow a student to come in and be disruptive to the point of imposing himself on others. People such as Ellen, on her talk show, have tried to paint this situation as Larry being killed simply because he was a homosexual. Not so. He was killed for humiliating another student and totally disregarding that student’s right to be free of harrassment and free of having another male come on to him.

Schools really need to revisit a uniform code. Doing so will, in my opinion, save lives. Be who you want to be on your own time, not the school’s time.

Source

By:  Lynn Green

  Maybe accused murderer, “minister” Reaves will find a boyfriend in jail.

An alleged homosexual “minister” named Robert Reaves is accused of murdering his roommates’s girfriend. Why? Jealousy over the fact that his male roommate turned down his offer to become his homosexual lover. How his roommate ended up living with this freak of nature is beyond me.

A man’s jealousy over a romantic relationship between his roommate and a North Carolina Central University student prompted him to kill the student last January, a prosecutor said Friday.

During a bond hearing for Robert Lee Adams Reaves, prosecutors said Reaves wanted to have a homosexual relationship with his roommate, Steven L. Randolph, and went into a rage when Randolph rebuffed him.

Reaves then followed Latrese Matral Curtis, who was having an affair with Randolph, after she left his apartment and killed her, prosecutors said.

SOURCE 

According to news reports, Reaves has a long history of criminal charges based on criminal sexual conduct with little boys:

Reaves began his career as a preacher at Pleasant Hill Baptist Church near Bennettsville, S.C., in the mid 1980s.

He left the church in 1987 after being accused of criminal sexual conduct involving a boy under age 17, said Pastor Earl Platt, the church’s current pastor who succeeded Reaves.

Reaves was charged with criminal sexual conduct Sept. 3, 1987, in Marlboro County, S.C., according to court records. He was convicted of third-degree sex charges on Jan. 1, 1988. Platt said Reaves served time in jail for that conviction.

Reaves was also charged with simple assault and battery in 1982 in South Carolina.

Platt described Reaves as a “gifted preacher” who had a true talent for communicating with people. Platt said he hoped Reaves would start “doing the right thing” and move past the sexual accusations.

“That was his past. I thought, you know, he rose above that,” Evans said.

According to published reports, Reaves next surfaced in New York City, where he served as pastor at Cedar of Lebanon Baptist Church and studied at Elim International Fellowship. He resigned in January 2002 to establish Cedar International Fellowship in Brooklyn.

Platt said sexual allegations involving Reaves and a male minor also surfaced in New York.

Court records show that Reaves was charged again with first-degree criminal sexual conduct on July 13, 2002. That charge led to what court records described as a “non-conviction.”

SOURCE

One more thing I must mention.  The dead woman was married and having an affair with Steven Randolph, the roommate of Robert Lee Adams.  Had she been home with her husband, where she belonged and not out engaged in adultery she would still be alive.

Hat tip to 2thehilt for story lead

By:  Lynn Green

Yvette emailed me today to inform me that a group of homosexuals in Michigan attacked a church.

A gay anarchist group infiltrated the Mt. Hope Church in Eaton County Sunday morning, disrupting a service by pulling a fire alarm, dropping leaflets and yelling at parishioners, a pastor said.

The group, Bash Back, was simultaneously picketing outside the church, beating on buckets and using a megaphone to shout Jesus was a homo and other slogans as confused churchgoers continued to enter the building.

Members of Bash Back issued a press release Tuesday saying that it targeted Mt. Hope, a church that claims a flock of around 5,000, because it is “complicit in the repression of queers in Michigan and beyond.”

This is not the first time that homosexuals have disrupted U.S. churches. And if you say something….you’ll be accused of “gay bashing” or “homophobic”. satan is alive and well, if you were confused about that fact. Anything bold enough to walk in the Body of Christ and attack it is without a soul and destined to fall into the Hands of the Living God. Pity them.

Source

And in a related story, watch them attack a t.v. crew and old woman due to their anger about proposition 8.  PRESS HERE

By:  Lynn Green

Attention whores are pathetic. Adult attention whores are even more pathetic. And male adult attention whores truly need to seek out some psychological help.

Check out this basket case who is supposedly suing two Christian publishers for publishing bible verses that state the obvious—that homosexuality is a sin. In other words, he is engaged in blaspheme, as he actually is taking on God. Let him keep on playing games with the Lord.

A homosexual man who has a blog on Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign website is suing two major Christian publishers for violating his constitutional rights and causing emotional pain, because the Bible versions they publish refer to homosexuality as a sin.
Bradley LaShawn Fowler, 39, of Canton, Mich., is seeking $60 million from Zondervan and another $10 million from Thomas Nelson Publishing in lawsuits filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, the Grand Rapids Press reported.

Fowler filed his claim against Grand Rapids-based Zondervan Monday, alleging its Bibles’ references to homosexuality as a sin have made him an outcast from his family and contributed to physical discomfort and periods of “demoralization, chaos and bewilderment,” the paper said.

He filed suit against Tennessee publisher Thomas Nelson in June.

Zondervan says that even if Fowler’s claim is credible, he’s suing the wrong party. A company spokesman told WOOD-TV in Grand Rapids that Zondervan doesn’t translate the Bible or own the copyright for any of the translations but relies, instead, on the “scholarly judgment of credible translation committees.”

U.S. District Judge Julian Abele Cook Jr. refused Monday to appoint an attorney to represent Fowler in the Thomas Nelson case, saying the court “has some very genuine concerns about the nature and efficacy of these claims.”

Fowler, who is representing himself in both lawsuits, says in his complaint against Zondervan that the publisher intended to design a religious, sacred document to reflect an individual opinion or a group’s conclusion to cause “me or anyone who is a homosexual to endure verbal abuse, discrimination, episodes of hate, and physical violence … including murder.”

Fowler alleges both Zondervan and Thomas Nelson, with its King James Bible, manipulated Scripture without informing the public by using the term “homosexuals” in a New Testament passage, 1 Corinthians 6:9.

He told the Grand Rapids TV station in an interview he wants to “compensate for the past 20 years of emotional duress and mental instability.”

PAUSE THERE He wants compensation for 20 years of mental instability? Oooooooookaaaaaay….satan is bold, isn’t he? The goal is to take away a Christian’s right to speak the truth. And the truth is that homosexuality is a sin.  Don’t like it? Take it up with God.

Source

By: Lynn

Feedback from around the nation on the same sex “marriage” ruling:

This will always be immoral. California’s highest court has created a fundamental marriage right out of behavior — homosexuality — that is fundamentally wrong and destructive.

Everywhere Americans turn — TV, media, schools, in corporations and the courts — this unhealthy and immoral behavior is being promoted.

source

Below is a Press Release:

California Supreme Court Betrays “We the People” on Marriage 5/15/2008

Washington, D.C. — Today the California Supreme Court imposed, through judicial fiat, so-called same-sex marriage on Californians, thus totally disregarding the sanctity of marriage and the will of the people. In 2000, Californians adopted Proposition 22 to protect marriage and maintain its definition as a union between one man and one woman, and expressly prohibiting the state from recognizing same sex marriages.

To ensure that marriage is protected and the voice of the people is heard, a constitutional marriage amendment must be placed on the November ballot and national efforts need to be made to generate a federal constitutional marriage amendment. The decision must be removed from the hands of judicial activists and returned to the rightful hands of the people.

Matt Barber, CWA Policy Director for Cultural Issues, said The California Supreme Court has engaged in the worst kind of judicial activism today, abandoning its role as an objective interpreter of the law and, instead, legislating from the bench. It’s absurd to suggest that the framers of the California state constitution could have ever imagined there’d be a day when so-called same-sex marriage would even be conceptualized, much less seriously considered. If anyone then had suggested the ridiculous notion, early Californians would have laughed their smocks off.

So-called same-sex marriage is counterfeit marriage. Marriage is, and has always been, between a man and a woman. We know that it’s in the best interest of children to be raised with a mother and a father. To use children as guinea pigs in radical San Francisco-style social experimentation is deplorable.

The majority of Americans recognize the fact that legitimate marriage and family are cornerstones of a healthy society. Reasonable people have had enough and are refusing to allow radical extremists to redefine marriage and family into oblivion. So-called same-sex marriage is a ridiculous and oxymoronic notion that has been forced into popular lexicon by homosexual activists and their extremist left-wing allies.

If people who engage in homosexual behavior want to dress up and play house, that’s their prerogative, but we shouldn’t destroy the institutions of legitimate marriage and family in order to help facilitate a counterfeit.

On a positive note, the Court’s decision today will likely serve as a wake-up call to both Californians and their fellow Americans across the country. I’m certain this decision will help fuel a California marriage amendment and re-ignite debate over a federal amendment which would protect marriage as between one man and one woman.

For Information Contact:
Natalie Bell
(202) 488-7000
media.cwfa.org

And of course James Dobson has weighed in on this issue:

Dr. James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family, is outraged by the court’s blatant disregard for marriage and the voters of California.

The will of the people has now arrogantly been declared null and void, he said. In so doing, the justices have undermined and endangered the basic building block of society, which has been honored and preserved in every nation on earth through most of human history.

Glen Lavy, senior counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, said the only way to permanently protect marriage in California is to amend the state constitution. A law, like Prop. 22, does not carry the same legal weight as a constitutional amendment.

The court’s decision clearly demonstrates that marriage is not ultimately safe from tampering by activists and others in government until the voters have amended the constitution, he said.

ProtectMarriage.com, a coalition of local, state and national groups, is working to place a constitutional marriage amendment on the California ballot in November. The group submitted 1.1 million signatures, which are currently under review for validation. Ron Prentice, who is working with the coalition, is optimistic the initiative will qualify for the ballot.

In November, the people will have an opportunity to overrule the Court’s decision by passing a constitutional amendment, Prentice said, and California’s voters must respond in strength and number.

Matt Barber, policy director of cultural issues for Concerned Women for America, hopes the court’s decision will serve as a wakeup call to Californians and fellow Americans across the country.

Marriage is, and has always been, between a man and a woman. We know that it’s in the best interest of children to be raised with a mother and a father, he said. This decision will help fuel a California marriage amendment and re-ignite debate over a federal amendment which would protect marriage as between one man and one woman.

Source

By: Lynn Green

At Smith College a group of homosexuals caused a disruption to Ryan Sorba, who was invited there to discuss and challenge the “born gay” belief that many have. Check out what happened to block him from utilizing his freedom of speech:

PRESS HERE