Look at the cluttered, filthy tent. That is where Jaycee Dugard was forced to live with her two children. The place is not even fit for a dog. 
Can you imagine the bug bites, lice, etc. that those three endured in that tent?
Can you imagine how they fought against the elements—horrible weather while in that inhumane tent?
And what about field mice and possibly even rats and bats and rabid animals? Can you imagine what they endured out there? The simple lack of humanity or decency. The humiliation. And why?
My husband brought to my attention a woman named Cheyvonne Molino [pictured on bike] who has been popping up in the media, appearing to support the monster and rapist and kidnapper and pedophile, Phillip Garrido—the demon who forced Jaycee and their children to live in the tent. [She has denied supporting him]
I turned to Anderson Cooper’s program and sure enough she was there sounding um, er, uh…odd. She made a comment which both Anderson and I interpreted as support of this pervert Garrido, but after Anderson brought her to task, she backed off and said that her focus is on the healing of the children. [Again, she says that she is not supporting Garrido]
Question: Support or not, what exactly is she bringing to this story other than her face on national television? Apparently she has no clue how bizarre she sounds as she talks out of two sides of her mouth regarding this hopeless creep:
Neighbors who have met Nancy Garrido say her disturbing non-communicative behavior was even stranger than her husband’s religious rants, according to the Telegraph.
Okay, I can accept that a woman who would go to a jailhouse to hunt down a husband—and then marry a know rapist is strange and odd and disturbing. That I can agree with. BUT…to say she is stranger than her pedophile husband?
“In some ways to me she is the real monster,” Cheyvonne Molino, an aquentance of the Garridos, told the British paper. “She is a woman and should never have let this happen.”
Molino said she saw Nancy Garrido and Dugard shopping together in a local supermarket this year.
Again…beyond receiving television space, I’m unclear as to what Cheyvonne Molino is bringing to the table. For her to say that Nancy Garrido should never have “let” it happen is to excuse him for coming up with the idea to snatch a child and rape and impregnate that child. Why is Phillip Garrido being taken off the hook or seen in a more positive light?
I’ll end with this. Phillip Garrido is responsible for his own actions. While I certainly want to see both him and his wife rot in prison [or receive the death penalty], my goal is to keep the primary light where it belongs—on Phillip Garrido.
LINK